This was one of those occasions when the scoreline doesn’t tell half
the story. If the form book was a reliable guide - which thankfully in
Davis Cup it often isn’t - the Dutch fans would have left the Palexpo
Arena with red faces to go with their orange shirts.
Instead they came away glowing with pride over their team’s
performance on the opening day of this World Group play-off,
particularly that of Thiemo de Bakker, who was not so very far away from
giving his team a shock lead in the opening rubber.
De Bakker led by 3-0 and two sets to one against the two-time Grand
Slam champion Stan Wawrinka only to “lose my head a bit for a while”, as
he put it, in the fifth set, enabling a much relieved Wawrinka to
prevail 2-6, 6-3, 4-6, 6-3, 7-5 in three hours and nine minutes.
“I played a great match, but at this moment I’m still a bit sad that I
didn’t take the match - I had my chances,” said de Bakker. “It’s tough.
I lost my focus in the fourth set and lost nine games in a row, I
think. Still had small chances, but he’s a great player and he kept
going.”
After that it would have taken a brave Swiss fan to predict with
utmost certainty that his country would lead 2-0 at the end of the
opening day, but of course Roger Federer seldom fails them and he came
through as expected 6-3, 6-4, 6-3 against Jesse Huta Galung, a player who
with a ranking of No. 436 obviously comes from a rather different world
to the 17-time Grand Slam champion.
“He’s doing everything different,” said Huta Galung of Federer. “He moves so
fast on the court - if you don’t look for a second to the other side
he’s on the net, he’s like a ghost.”
For a few minutes, though, at the start of the fourth set of the
opening rubber it was the Davis Cup champion who was looking haunted.
While de Bakker left the recent US Open almost before the tournament
had started, losing in straight sets in the first round of qualifying,
his Swiss opponent had gone all the way to the semi-finals only to lose
to his compatriot Federer. Only a week ago de Bakker lost in straight
sets in the first round of a Challenger event. Who’d be a tennis pundit?
However, Jan Siemerink, the Dutch captain, had warned that de Bakker
on his day can be a handful for anyone and that the Swiss were well
aware of that fact. He was not wrong. De Bakker broke Wawrinka in the
opening game and never looked back, well, for the next three hours or so
he didn’t. He might now.
His aim was to come to the net and take away time from the world No. 4
and it was a tactic that worked wonderfully well for the most part. It
even took Federer by surprise, never mind Wawrinka.
“We knew he had potential and could be dangerous, but he changed his
game up and served and volleyed a lot, which was not maybe to be
expected because he also likes to stay at the baseline,” said Federer.
“I think he did as well as he could, probably should have won at the
end, but Stan got a sniff and showed why he’s a top four player.”
How much Wawrinka’s exertions at the US Open played a part in
proceedings is difficult to say, but certainly his timing, length of
shot and first serve were often horribly awry. The fact that he was
unable to summon a smile at the finish said all that one needed to know
about how satisfied he was with his performance.
To his credit he stuck to his task and like all good players ground
out a victory while playing poorly. Some players would have thrown in
the towel at the start of the fourth set and said to himself, “Roger
will get us back into it”. Not Wawrinka.
From 3-0 down in that fourth set he shook off the jet lag, weariness
or whatever it was that had made him look like a rookie at times to win
nine games on the trot, enabling him to square the match at two sets all
and take a commanding lead in the fifth set.
“I just tried to stay positive, tried to fight and find a solution,
tried to make him play more,” said Wawrinka. “I know how well he can
play, how well he can serve. He hasn’t had a lot of big matches lately
and I thought he might tire. He looked nervous in the fourth set and
started to miss easy balls.”
Credit de Bakker, too, for not giving up when he must have felt the
tide was turning against him in the final set, breaking back to level at
3-3. Serving first in the set was definitely an advantage for Wawrinka,
but De Bakker took it to the wire and then some.
The Dutch couldn’t hide their disappointment, though. “I’m not saying
he had to win this match,” said Siemerink, “but he had an opportunity
to get into the position to win it. At the end of the day, we’re all
sportsmen, we’re not coming here for holidays, we’re coming here for a
good result and in the first match a good result was possible.”
Date: 18th September 2015, Source: Davis Cup